docs, docs, docs

This commit is contained in:
Dominik Chilla 2019-02-12 23:06:15 +01:00
parent ab91b8b5cb
commit de11c995e6

View File

@ -1,45 +1,68 @@
# ldap-acl-milter
A lightweight, fast and thread-safe python3 milter on top of [sdgathman/pymilter](https://github.com/sdgathman/pymilter) for basic Access Control (ACL) scenarios. The milter consumes policies from LDAP based on custom queries with trivial templating support (%from% = RFC5321.from; %rcpt% = RFC5321.rcpt). So, if you already have a LDAP server running with e.g. amavis-schema, you may reuse the 'amavisWhitelistSender'/'amavisBlacklistSender' attributes. Please have a look at the docker-compose.yml example. Of course one is free to write an own LDAP schema for his/her case ;)
A lightweight, fast and thread-safe python3 [milter](http://www.postfix.org/MILTER_README.html) on top of [sdgathman/pymilter](https://github.com/sdgathman/pymilter) for basic Access Control (ACL) scenarios. The milter consumes policies from LDAP based on custom queries with trivial templating support (%from% = RFC5321.from; %rcpt% = RFC5321.rcpt).
The LDAP-connection is always persistent: one TCP-Session/one LDAP-bind shared among all milter-threads, which makes it less overhead. Thus, LDAP interactions with 3 msec. and less are realistic, depending on your environment like network round-trip-times, the load of your LDAP server, ...
In the case, one already has a LDAP server running with the [amavis schema](https://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/LDAP.schema.txt), the 'amavisWhitelistSender' attribute could be reused. The filtering direction (inbound or outbound) can be simply controlled by swapping the %from% and %rcpt% placeholders within the LDAP query template. Please have a look at the docker-compose.yml example.
The milter base ([sdgathman/pymilter](https://github.com/sdgathman/pymilter)) is able to 'spawn' hundreds of threads within a wink ;)
The connection to the LDAP server is always persistent: one TCP-Session/one LDAP-bind shared among all milter-threads, which makes it more efficient due to less communication overhead. Thus, LDAP interactions with 2 msec. and less are realistic, depending on your environment like network round-trip-times or the load of your LDAP server. A very swag LDAP setup is to use a local read-only LDAP replica, which syncs over network with a couple of LDAP masters: [OpenLDAP does it for free!](https://www.openldap.org/doc/admin24/replication.html). This aproach eliminates network round trip times while reading operations as well as race conditions on a shared, centralized and (heavy) utilized LDAP server.
The intention of this project is to deploy the milter ALWAYS AND ONLY as a docker container. The main reason ist that I´m not so familiar with/interested in building distribution packages (rpm, deb, ...). Furthermore I´m not realy a fan of 'wild and uncontrollable' software deployments: get the code, compile and finaly install the results 'somewhere' in the filesystem. In term of CI/CD docker gives us wonderful possibilities I don´t want to miss anymore...
### Deployment paradigm
The intention of this project is to deploy the milter ALWAYS AND ONLY as an [OCI compliant](https://www.opencontainers.org)) container. In this case it´s [docker](https://www.docker.com). The main reason is that I´m not interested (and familiar with) in building distribution packages like .rpm, .deb, etc.. Furthermore I´m not realy a fan of 'wild and uncontrollable' software deployments like: get the code, compile it and finaly install the results 'somewhere' in the filesystem. In terms of software deployment docker provides wonderful possibilities, which I don´t want to miss anymore... No matter if in development, QA or production stage.
### docker-compose.yml
The following [docker-compose](https://docs.docker.com/compose/) file demonstrates how such a setup could be orchestrated on a single docker host or on a docker swarm cluster. In this context we use [postfix](http://www.postfix.org) as our milter-capable MTA and OpenLDAP as local LDAP replica.
```
version: '3'
volumes:
lam_socket:
openldap_spool:
openldap_socket:
services:
openldap:
image: "your/favorite/openldap/image"
restart: unless-stopped
hostname: openldap
volumes:
- "./config/openldap:/etc/openldap:rw"
- "openldap_spool:/var/openldap-data:rw"
- "openldap_socket:/socket:rw"
ldap-acl-milter:
image: "ldap-acl-milter/debian:19.02_devel"
depends_on:
- openldap
image: "ldap-acl-milter/debian:19.02_master"
restart: unless-stopped
environment:
LDAP_SERVER: ldap://ldap-slave.example.org:389
LDAP_BINDDN: uid=lam,ou=apps,dc=example,dc=org
LDAP_BINDPW: TopSecret1!
#LDAP_SERVER: ldap://ldap-slave.example.local:389
LDAP_SERVER: ldapi:///socket//slapd//slapd
LDAP_BINDDN: uid=lam,ou=applications,dc=example,dc=org
LDAP_BINDPW: TopSecret123!%&
LDAP_BASE: ou=users,dc=example,dc=org
# This example LDAP query is for inbound filtering
# where the 'mail' attribute equals to the recipient
# and the 'amavisWhitelistSender' attribute the eligible sender
LDAP_QUERY: (&(mail=%rcpt%)(amavisWhitelistSender=%from%))
# Socket default: /socket/ldap-acl-milter
# MILTER_SOCKET: inet6:8020
MILTER_REJECT_MESSAGE: Rejected due to security policy violation
# Default: UNIX-socket located under /socket/ldap-acl-milter
# https://pythonhosted.org/pymilter/namespacemilter.html#a266a6e09897499d8b1ae0e20f0d2be73
#MILTER_SOCKET: inet6:8020
MILTER_REJECT_MESSAGE: Message rejected due to security policy
hostname: ldap-acl-milter
volumes:
- "lam_socket:/socket/:rw"
- "openldap_socket:/socket/slapd:ro"
postfix:
depends_on:
- ldap-acl-milter
image: "postfix/alpine/amd64"
image: "your/favorite/postfix/image"
restart: unless-stopped
hostname: postfix
ports:
- "25:25"
volumes:
- "./config/postfix:/etc/postfix:rw"
- "lam_socket:/socket/:rw"
- "lam_socket:/socket/ldap-acl-milter/:rw"
- "openldap_socket:/socket/slapd:ro"
```